Hermetica hBTC Vault
Risk Score
Discover, filter, and compare top-tier opportunities across L2s, DeFi, and staking layers.
Hermetica hBTC Vault
Risk Score
Morpho Gauntlet Vault
Risk Score
Sypher Capital Bitcoin Yield Fund
Risk Score
Amboss Magma
Risk Score
Coinbase Bitcoin Yield Fund
Risk Score
Lombard Bitcoin Earn
Risk Score
Starknet BTC Staking
Risk Score
Zest Protocol
Risk Score
Solv BTC+
Risk Score
Amboss RAILS
Risk Score
Lightning Network
Risk Score
stBTC Vault (Botanix)
Risk Score
Lombard Finance
Risk Score
Mezo Earn
Risk Score
Babylon
Risk Score
YieldBasis cbBTC Vault: Token Yield
Risk Score
YieldBasis wBTC Vault: Token Yield
Risk Score
YieldBasis tBTC Vault: Token Yield
Risk Score
YieldBasis cbBTC Vault: Real Yield
Risk Score
YieldBasis wBTC Vault: Real Yield
Risk Score
YieldBasis tBTC Vault: Real Yield
Risk Score
Merlin Chain
Risk Score
Acre
Risk Score
sBTC Dual Stacking (Boosted Yield)
Risk Score
Zenrock
Risk Score
sBTC Dual Stacking (Base Yield)
Risk Score
Everything you need to know about Bitcoin yieldLearn more about Bitcoin yield, staking, and how to maximize your BTC returns.
Version 1.2
This framework evaluates Bitcoin yield products across five pillars: Custody & Asset Control, Smart Contract & Execution Risk, Yield Source & Economic Sustainability, Liquidity & Exit Dynamics, and Transparency & Verifiability.
Scoring principle
We prioritize the risk of capital impairment. A product is judged by how easily user principal can be impaired, not by how decentralized or elegant it looks on paper.
Who controls access to the underlying BTC, and can user principal be withheld, seized, or frozen by a single party?
Green · Trust-Minimized / User-Enforced — users retain unilateral or protocol-enforced claim to BTC without relying on a single entity’s discretion. Recovery is governed by Bitcoin-native or credibly decentralized rules.
Yellow · Quorum / Qualified Custodian — recovery depends on an honest quorum, bridge signer set, federation, or regulated custodian rather than direct user control.
Red · Single-Entity Dependency — recovery depends on one company or legal structure that can freeze access, fail operationally, or leave users structurally exposed in insolvency.
If the code fails or admins intervene, how much user principal can actually be impaired?
Green · Limited Blast Radius — contracts are immutable or tightly scoped, and a contract failure would not directly allow unilateral loss of core user principal. Operational disruption may still be possible.
Yellow · Admin Guardrails / Contained Control — the protocol is upgradable, pauseable, or still maturing, but admin powers are primarily defensive and do not create clean unilateral control over principal.
Red · Direct Fund Control / Unbounded Blast Radius — a contract exploit or admin action can directly move collateral, rewrite withdrawal rules instantly, or materially impair principal.
Does the yield come from durable economic activity, or from subsidies, reflexivity, and fragile strategy dependence?
Green · Economically Real / Non-Reflexive — yield comes from identifiable economic activity and would still exist if token incentives disappeared. The payout may vary with market conditions but is not sustained by emissions.
Yellow · Real Yield, Material Dependencies — yield is economically real, but a meaningful share depends on active management, basis spreads, counterparties, credit underwriting, market structure, or temporary incentive support.
Red · Reflexive / Fragile — yield depends primarily on token emissions, undercollateralized credit, aggressive leverage, or structures that weaken when new capital slows or incentives fade.
How quickly and reliably can a user redeem back to base BTC during stress?
Green · Immediate & Rules-Based — users can redeem on demand with no protocol-enforced queue, lock, or discretionary gate.
Yellow · Queued / Market-Dependent — exits are allowed, but require notice, unbonding, cool-down periods, batch processing, or reliance on secondary-market liquidity.
Red · Locked / Discretionary — exits can be blocked by fixed lockups, manual intervention, legal restrictions, or terms that allow the operator to pause redemptions during stress.
Can I independently verify the assets, liabilities, and yield path with minimal trust and minimal delay?
Green · Continuously Verifiable — a third party can independently verify solvency, backing, and strategy exposure on a continuous or near-real-time basis, either on-chain or via public cryptographic attestations.
Yellow · Delayed / Partial Attestation — transparency is present but delayed, incomplete, or dependent on a single authorized verifier (e.g., periodic proof-of-reserves, monthly auditor reports, proof of assets without liabilities).
Red · Opaque / Black Box — no cryptographic proof of reserves, hidden wallet addresses or counterparties, omitted liabilities, or a proprietary non-auditable yield engine.
Every pillar has an objective Pass/Fail check. A product cannot score Green on any pillar unless the supporting evidence is explicit in the research report.